Federico Arnaboldi vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Nov at 03:17 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Arnaboldi vs N. Fatic

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Arnaboldi 1 - 0 Fatic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Federico Arnaboldi winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 1. The last match between Federico Arnaboldi and Nerman Fatic was at the Bergamo Challenger, 19-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Federico Arnaboldi getting the victory 7-5 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arnaboldi | 1 |
| Fatic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Bergamo Challenger(11-19-25)
F. Arnaboldi vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $12,090 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
| 54.03% (208-177) | Career Total W/L | 58.47% (404-287) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
F. Arnaboldi vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- How do both players fare on their second serve recently? Nerman Fatic wins 44.16% of points, while Federico Arnaboldi achieves a slightly higher figure at 44.96%.
- In recent return game performance, Fatic has an edge, winning 45.03% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Arnaboldi's 43.97%.
- First serve return advantage goes to Fatic, claiming 28.84% compared to Arnaboldi's 26.44%.
- Under pressure, Fatic and Arnaboldi are nearly equal, saving breakpoints at 54.06% and 54.02% respectively.
- Fatic has a superior match win percentage over the past year, standing at 75.36%, vastly outperforming Arnaboldi's 35.56%.
- What surfaces do they excel on? Both players thrive on different surfaces; Fatic shines on Clay, winning 61%, while Arnaboldi performs best on Hard, also with a 61% win rate.
- Fatic has demonstrated strong results in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 65.79% of such matches, whereas Arnaboldi struggles with 36.11% wins.
- Fatic's opponents have been lower ranked on average than Arnaboldi's, with average ranks of 345.74 and 251.09, respectively.
- In deciding sets, Fatic shows remarkable resilience, winning 89% compared to Arnaboldi’s 73%.
- Fatic converts breakpoints at a higher rate, 33.52%, in contrast to Arnaboldi's 24.21% which could be decisive in crucial game situations.
Editorial Prediction (November 19, 2025, UTC):
Nerman Fatic enters this match with a noteworthy advantage in multiple statistical categories. His superior return game, particularly on first serves, positions him favorably against Federico Arnaboldi.
Although their pressure handling on breakpoints is comparable, Fatic's higher breakpoint conversion rate offers a potential edge in pivotal moments. Additionally, Fatic's consistency in winning matches over the past year provides him with a confidence boost.
While both players display a preference for different surfaces, the upcoming match's surface is not noted, yet Fatic’s adaptability is highlighted through his strong performance record in ITF tournaments.
Given these factors, including his commanding performance in deciding sets, Nerman Fatic is the stronger candidate to secure victory in this match against Federico Arnaboldi.
Federico Arnaboldi vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Arnaboldi vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:37:0 | Average Match Time | 2:37:0 |
| 55% (59/108) | 1st Serve % | 65% (71/110) |
| 69% (41/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (44/71) |
| 49% (24/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (17/39) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 45% (49/110) | Return Points Win % | 40% (43/108) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Arnaboldi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

F. Arnaboldi vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.03% (208/177) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.47% (404/287) |
| 52.79% (463/414) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.49% (890/658) |
| 51.21% (4158/3962) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7602/6734) |
| 57.78% (26/19) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 56.23% (167/130) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 35.71% (15/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 772 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1137 | Total Double Faults | 1517 |
| 1:26:56 | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 431.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.49 |
| 59% (12875/21810) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23791/35820) |
| 67% (8563/12875) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15579/23791) |
| 47% (4237/8935) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5772/12029) |
| 44% (986/2219) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1969/4222) |
| 41% (8794/21281) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15618/36165) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 43.55% (54/70) | Challenger W/L | 52.89% (119/106) |
| 59.84% (152/102) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 54% (206/381) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/662) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 53% (51/96) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 57% (62/109) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 89% (198/177) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/348) |
| 11% (198/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (394/42) |
| 17% (187/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (297/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Sonay Kartal vs Anhelina Kalinina Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 10th December 2025 Best Bets

Fiona Ferro vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 10th December 2025 Best Bets

Anastasija Sevastova vs Barbora Krejcikova Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 9th December 2025 Best Bets

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Katarzyna Kawa Betting Tips & Picks December 9, 2025

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs Jessika Ponchet Betting Tips & Picks December 10, 2025
